英検準1級|英作文・要約の高得点/低得点事例集


① まずは下の4つのトピックから選ぶ → ② 各トピックの事例1〜3を押す → ③ 下に詳細(講評 / TOPIC / 本文)が開きます!
高得点(GOOD)事例
★ 高得点 (真似する)

英検準1級の英作文の高得点事例!

文法ミスなし!シンプルに伝わる文を書く!必見の高得点事例!

要約の高得点事例!

語数は60~70語!70%以上言い換える!改行しない!文法ミスなし!
低得点(NG)事例
⚠ 低得点 (避ける)

英検準1級の英作文の低得点事例!

キホン文法のミス多い!英検ライティングのテンプレに従ってない!多くの人が心当たりあるはず!他人のミス見て気づけること多い!

要約の低得点事例!

そもそも、、要約のキホンが出来てない!元の文からコピペしない!suggested length(60~70)以内にまとめる!
英検準1級の英作文の高得点事例!
採点結果
◆全体:16点/16点中
語い:4/4
文法:4/4
内容:4/4
構成:4/4

文法ミスなし(めちゃくちゃ大事)、スペルミスなし、構成Good、意見も明確!すごく良い英作文です。
TOPIC
Should Japanese companies do more to encourage employees to work from home?

POINTS
● Work management
● Cost
● Commuting stress
● Efficiency/div>
本文(英作文)
I believe that Japanese companies should do more to encourage employees to work from home. I have two reasons to support this, based on commuting stress and efficiency.

First, remote work relieves workers of commuting stress. These days, many people spend a lot of time commuting to work, which is stressful and lowers their performance. However, if they work from home, they can save commuting time, resulting in higher productivity.

Second, employees can work more efficiently. For example, since meetings can be held online, there is no need to reserve a conference room. This means that remote work enables workers to finish tasks more quickly, giving them more free time.

It is for the reasons mentioned above that Japanese companies should encourage employees to telecommute more.
添削の詳細
◆添削
I believe that Japanese companies should do more to encourage employees to work from home.
⇒OKです。

I have two reasons to support this, based on commuting stress and efficiency.
⇒OKです。

First, remote work relieves workers of commuting stress.
⇒OKです。

These days, many people spend a lot of time commuting to work, which is stressful and lowers their performance.
⇒OKです。

However, if they work from home, they can save commuting time, resulting in higher productivity.
⇒OKです。
※あえて書くならcommutingが4文連続で続くので、travel to work などの言い換えしても良いと思います。

Second, employees can work more efficiently.
⇒OKです。

For example, since meetings can be held online, there is no need to reserve a conference room.
⇒OKです。

This means that remote work enables workers to finish tasks more quickly, giving them more free time.
⇒OKです。

It is for the reasons mentioned above that Japanese companies should encourage employees to telecommute more.
⇒OKです。
採点
◆全体:16点/16点中
語い:4/4
文法:4/4
内容:4/4
構成:4/4

文法ミスなし、スペルミスなし、構成も良く内容もしっかり伝わります。
TOPIC
Agree or disagree: The number of foreign workers in Japan will increase in the future

POINTS
● Aging society
● Unpopular jobs
● Unemployed Japanese
● Increase in tensions

本文(英作文)
I agree with the opinion that the number of foreign workers in Japan will increase in the future. I have two reasons.

First, Japan is facing the problem of a declining birthrate and an aging population. Recently, this issue has led to a decrease in Japan’s workforce. However, if companies suffering from a shortage of workers employ foreign workers, we can increase the workforce. Therefore, foreign workers can play important roles in Japanese society.

Second, many foreign workers are willing to take jobs that Japanese workers are reluctant to do. This is because these jobs are often dangerous. On the other hand, foreign workers do them in order to earn money for living in Japan. This means that foreign workers actively work for unpopular jobs, which makes society better.

It is for the reasons mentioned above that the number of foreign workers in Japan will increase in the future.
添削の詳細
◆添削
I agree with the opinion that the number of foreign workers in Japan will increase in the future.
⇒OKです。

I have two reasons.
⇒OKです。

First, Japan is facing the problem of a declining birthrate and an aging population.
⇒OKです。

Recently, this issue has led to a decrease in Japan’s workforce.
⇒OKです。

However, if companies suffering from a shortage of workers employ foreign workers, we can increase the workforce.
1)“we”の主体が分かりづらく、主語を“companies/Japan”すると良いと思います。
改善例:However, if companies suffering from a shortage of workers employ foreign workers, Japan can increase the workforce.

Therefore, foreign workers can play important roles in Japanese society.
⇒OKです。

Second, many foreign workers are willing to take jobs that Japanese workers are reluctant to do.
⇒OKです。

This is because these jobs are often dangerous.
1)文章がやや単調なので、あえて書くならdangerousだけでなく、“low-paid and dangerous”など足すとより良いと思います。
改善例:This is because these jobs are often low-paid and dangerous.

On the other hand, foreign workers do them in order to earn money for living in Japan.
⇒OKです。

This means that foreign workers actively work for unpopular jobs, which makes society better.
⇒OKです。

It is for the reasons mentioned above that the number of foreign workers in Japan will increase in the future.
⇒OKです。
採点
◆全体:15点/16点中
語い:4/4
文法:4/4
内容:4/4
構成:3/4

文法ミスなし、スペルミスなし、構成もOKでかなり良く書けているのですが、 ココは練習なのであえて指摘するなら同じような単語や表現のくり返しがあるので、もう少し豊富に表現を使えるとさらに良いです。
TOPIC
Is it a good idea for companies to hire elderly workers?

POINTS
● Salaries
● The workforce
● Skills
● Health
本文(英作文)
I believe that it is a good idea for companies to hire elderly workers. I have two reasons to support this based on the workforce and skills.

First, one of the most significant elements in business operations is the workforce. These days, the number of young workers has declined significantly due to a decrease in the birthrate. In such situations, the employment of elderly workers increases the workforce, resulting in the further growth of companies.

Second, elderly workers have a wealth of experience and skills. These skills can be shared with younger workers, which helps them work more efficiently. For example, elderly workers can prevent younger workers from making mistakes with their knowledge. This means that the assistance of elderly workers boosts company productivity.

It is for the reasons mentioned above that it is beneficial for businesses to employ elderly workers.
添削の詳細
I believe that it is a good idea for companies to hire elderly workers.
⇒OKです。

I have two reasons to support this based on the workforce and skills.
⇒OKです。

First, one of the most significant elements in business operations is the workforce.
⇒OKです。

These days, the number of young workers has declined significantly due to a decrease in the birthrate.
1)間違ってないのですが、“declined … due to a decrease”で語の重複があるので文自体をもう少しまとめて書けます。以下例です。
改善例:These days, the number of young workers has fallen because of the low birth rate.

In such situations, the employment of elderly workers increases the workforce, resulting in the further growth of companies.
⇒OKです。

Second, elderly workers have a wealth of experience and skills.
⇒OKです。

These skills can be shared with younger workers, which helps them work more efficiently.
⇒OKです。

For example, elderly workers can prevent younger workers from making mistakes with their knowledge.
⇒OKです。

This means that the assistance of elderly workers boosts company productivity.
⇒OKです。

It is for the reasons mentioned above that it is beneficial for businesses to employ elderly workers.
1)間違いではないのですが、It is ~ it is は言い回しが伝わりづらくなるので、最初のit is(2回目のit isも)書かない方がシンプルに伝えられると思います。以下例です。
改善例:For these reasons, employing elderly workers benefits businesses.
要約の高得点事例!
採点
◆全体 16点/16点中
語い:4/4
文法:4/4
内容:4/4
構成:4/4

素晴らしい!suggeted lengthの60〜70語、改行なし、文法ミスなし、抜き出すポイントもgoodで満点です!
問題文
In recent years, Finland experienced economic challenges and rising unemployment rates. To address these issues and offer a potential solution, the Finnish government decided to test a new idea in 2017: a basic income system. For two years, they gave 2000 unemployed citizens a monthly sum of €560 without any conditions. The idea was to see if this could help people find work without the fear of losing benefits.

Those who supported the basic income system in Finland believed that it would offer several advantages. It would remove the stress and pressure that unemployed people feel when searching for a job. This would encourage them to pursue training or education to get a better job or one most suitable for them.

On the other hand, other people had concerns. They worried that providing money without conditions might reduce the motivation for some people to seek employment. There were also concerns about the long-term financial sustainability of such a system. Critics questioned whether the government could afford to extend this program to all citizens without significantly raising taxes or cutting other vital services.
回答(63 words)
In 2017, Finland tested a basic income by paying 2,000 unemployed people €560 a month with no strings attached. Supporters said it reduced stress while job hunting and encouraged training for better work. Critics warned it could leave some people unmotivated, regardless of the circumstances, and questioned whether it was sustainable long-term without significantly raising taxes or cutting other vital services.
添削
1) In 2017, Finland tested a basic income by paying 2,000 unemployed people €560 a month with no strings attached.
⇒OKです。("with no strings attached" が "without any conditions" を自然に言い換えています。)

2) Supporters said it reduced stress while job hunting and encouraged training for better work.
⇒OKです。(要点2つを入れらています。)

3) Critics warned it could leave some people unmotivated, regardless of the circumstances, and questioned whether it was sustainable long-term without significantly raising taxes or cutting other vital services.
⇒OKです。(反対側の要点+財政面まで入り、表現もgoodです。)
採点
◆全体 16点/16点中
語い:4/4
文法:4/4
内容:4/4
構成:4/4

抜き出すポイントOK、提示語数(60~70)以内でOK、改行なし、文法ミスなしで高得点です。 あえて書くなら the と指定する必要がない単語があります。
問題文
Schools in some countries have often supplied free lunch to a limited number of their students. These meals tend to include a variety of foods, including salads and desserts. Nowadays, there are programs that provide such lunches to all students. Many in favor of the programs want them to continue.
Supporters point to the benefits. Studies show a relationship between nutrition and how well students do in school. Therefore, providing a healthy meal for all students is important. Doing this can improve their concentration levels, leading to better test scores. Additionally, free school meal programs have another advantage. Many parents today are often extremely busy, giving them little time to prepare lunches for their children. The programs, therefore, are a huge help. This is because parents of all students will be able to spend more time on work and other child-raising issues. Critics, on the other hand, say that providing school meals for everyone is problematic. Schools need to prepare enough meals every day for all students. However, some students do not completely eat the food that has been prepared. Consequently, a large amount is left over. The schools have no option but to throw it away.
回答
While schools in some countries have often provided free lunch to a part of the students, there are programs that enable all students to have the free lunch. Supporters say that nutritious meals have positive effects on students' academic performance. Moreover, free lunch can enable student's parents to save time for work and households. Critics, however, argue that the duty of providing adequate meals every day can cause various problems.
添削
While schools in some countries have often provided free lunch to a part of the students, there are programs that enable all students to have the free lunch. 1)間違いではないのですが、“a part of the students” は“only some students / a limited number of students” がより良いです。 2)細かいですが、“the free lunch” の the はランチ自体を特定してるわけではないので不要です。 改善例:While schools in some countries have often provided free lunch to only some students, there are programs that enable all students to have free lunch. Supporters say that nutritious meals have positive effects on students' academic performance. Moreover, free lunch can enable student's parents to save time for work and households. 1)“households” は“household responsibilities / child-rearing” 等に出来るとより良いです。 改善例:Supporters say that nutritious meals have positive effects on students' academic performance. Moreover, free lunch can enable student's parents to save time for work and household responsibilities. Critics, however, argue that the duty of providing adequate meals every day can cause various problems. ⇒OKです。
採点
◆全体 16点/16点中
語い:4/4
文法:4/4
内容:4/4
構成:4/4

文法ミスなし、言い換えも自然。主要ポイント(利点2つ+反対意見2つ)も過不足なく入り、60〜70語・改行なしで満点です。
問題文
Online language learning has become increasingly popular in recent years. With the help of mobile apps, video lessons, and online tutors, people can now study languages anytime and anywhere. This method of learning is especially attractive to busy students and working adults who cannot attend traditional classes.

Supporters say that online learning is flexible and convenient. Students can choose the time, place, and pace of their study, which helps them learn more efficiently. Online platforms often include various resources such as quizzes, games, and speech recognition, making language study more interactive and enjoyable. In addition, learners have access to native speakers and cultural content that may not be available in their local area. Some people even say that online study encourages independence and helps build good learning habits.

However, some people are less enthusiastic. Critics argue that online learning lacks the face-to-face communication and group interaction found in classrooms. Without regular in-person practice, learners may not develop natural speaking skills. Also, students who struggle with self-motivation may find it difficult to stay focused without a teacher present. These concerns make some educators question whether online language learning can fully replace traditional methods.
回答
Online language learning has become popular because apps and tutors let busy people study anytime and anywhere. Supporters say it is flexible, offers interactive resources and access to native speakers, and can foster independence and good study habits. Critics argue it cannot match classroom communication and group interaction, may weaken natural speaking skills, and makes it harder for learners with low self-motivation to stay focused.
添削
Online language learning has become popular because apps and tutors let busy people study anytime and anywhere. Supporters say it is flexible, offers interactive resources and access to native speakers, and can foster independence and good study habits. Critics argue it cannot match classroom communication and group interaction, may weaken natural speaking skills, and makes it harder for learners with low self-motivation to stay focused.
⇒OKです。
英検準1級の英作文の低得点事例!
採点
◆全体:5点/16点中
語い:1/4
文法:1/4
内容:2/4
構成:1/4

点数低いと思うかもしれませんが、
①英検のエッセイの書き方を知る
②基礎文法を直す
の2点でまずは大きく改善されるはずです。

①は https://eigo-duke.com/tango/writejun1index.html を見て下さい。
②の原因は it is depends (be動詞と depends の重複)などたくさんありますので
まずは添削を見て頂き、もし文法苦手な意識があるなら基礎文法を固めたほうが良いと思います。※大岩のいちばんはじめの英文法(超基礎編)など一冊やることオススメです。
TOPIC
Should people trust information on the Internet?

・Learning
・News
・Online shopping
・Social media
回答
I think it is depends on the sites either trust or not because internet has a lot of risks.
So I believe that you shouldn't trust information on the internet easily.

First, there are a lot of sites on the internet.
And many of these sites were created by strangers.
In that case, you shouldn't trust on the information completely as you don't know who wrote it.

But, some of sites are trustable such as a official site and government't site.
There public sites can't inform a wrong thing.
In addition, you should avoid deceiving sites.
These sites are created as if a official ones in order to get your individual information.

So, you should pay attention to internet sites.
That is why I thought that.
If you want to trust internet's information, you have to install some security app.
添削
I think it is depends on the sites either trust or not because internet has a lot of risks.
1)準1級はdon'tと短縮しない方が良いです。公式のエッセイなどでは短縮しないためです。英検の公式解答例も準1級から短縮されなくなります。
2)thinkよりbelieveを使うことがオススメです。エッセイではbelieveを使うことが良く、準1級からは公式解答もbelieveになるため。
3)it is depends は、be動詞と depends を重ねてしまっていて文法的に誤りです。ここは it depends だけにすべきです。
4)depends on the sites either trust or not はtrustに対する主語がsiteにはならないです。サイトは信用「される」と受け身です。「どのサイトかによって、信用できるかどうかが決まる」 という意味がはっきり伝わるように、depends on the website whether you can trust it or not の形にします。また、internet の前には the を付けて the internet にすべきです。
改善例:I believe it depends on the website whether you can trust it or not, because the internet has a lot of risks.

So I believe that you shouldn't trust information on the internet easily.
1)エッセイでは短縮形を避けたいので、shouldn't を should not に直します。
2)you だと読み手個人に話しかける口調になるので、一般論としての印象を強くするために people に変えるとよいです。
3)ここでは意見を重ねるより(英検のテンプレとしては)私は二つの理由がある と書いた方が良いです。
改善例:So I believe that people should not trust information on the internet easily.
英検に合致する改善例:I have two reasons to support my opinion.

First, there are a lot of sites on the internet.
1)文法的には正しいですが、sites よりも websites の方が今の文脈には合っています。
改善例:First, there are a lot of websites on the internet.

And many of these sites were created by strangers.
1)文頭を And で始めると会話的になりすぎるので、エッセイでは Also や In addition にするとよいです。
2)were created だと「過去に作られた」という過去の話になります。現在もそうであることを表すために are created か、「誰だか分からない人が運営している」という意味で are run by people you do not know とするのとより良いと思います。
改善例:Also, many of these sites are created by people you do not know.

In that case, you shouldn't trust on the information completely as you don't know who wrote it.
1)trust on the information は前置詞の使い方が誤りで、trust the information と前置詞なしで使います。
2)ここも短縮形を避けるために、shouldn't → should not、don't → do not にします。また、「完全に信じてはいけない」をはっきり出すために、completely の位置を動かして you should not completely trust that information の形にすると良いです。
改善例:In that case, you should not completely trust that information, as you do not know who wrote it.

But, some of sites are trustable such as a official site and government't site.
1)文頭は But, よりも、エッセイでは However, を使う方が良いです。
2)some of sites は some sites か some of the sites に直します。
3)trustable はあまり使われないので、ここでは trustworthy や reliable を使うと良いです。
4)a official site は母音で始まるので an official site にします。government't site はスペルが誤りなので、a government site か government websites に直します。
改善例:However, some of the sites are trustworthy, such as official sites and government sites.

There public sites can't inform a wrong thing.
1)ここは There ではなく、直前の公的サイトを指すので These public sites にします。
2)inform a wrong thing は伝わらず。「間違った情報を出せない」と言いたいと思うので、cannot publish wrong information や cannot provide false information に言い換えます。
改善例:These public sites cannot publish wrong information.

In addition, you should avoid deceiving sites.
1)deceiving sites は、文法的には可能ですが、伝わりづらく普通は「人をだます側のサイト」という意味で deceptive sites や fraudulent sites を使うと良いです。
2)youではなく 三人称の people/they が良いです。
改善例:In addition, people should avoid deceptive sites.

These sites are created as if a official ones in order to get your individual information.
1)a official ones は「a +複数形」で文法的に誤りです。ここは as if they were official ones のように、they を主語にした形に直します。
2)individual information は英語ではあまり使わないので、personal information(個人情報)にします。
改善例:These sites are created as if they were official ones in order to get your personal information.

So, you should pay attention to internet sites.
1)So, のカンマはあっても構いませんが、エッセイでは So の代わりに Therefore や For this reason を使うとフォーマルになります。
2)internet sites よりも websites on the internet の方が分かりやすいです。また、「注意を払う」は be careful when you use の形にすると具体的になります。
改善例:Therefore, you should be careful when you use websites on the internet.

That is why I thought that.
1)このままだと、「それが私がそう思った理由でした」という過去形で途中で切れている感じになります。ここは現在の意見としてまとめたいので、That is why I think this way. のように現在形にし、that を一つにして文を完結させます。
改善例:That is why I think this way.

If you want to trust internet's information, you have to install some security app.
1)internet's information という所有格は不自然なので、「インターネット上の情報」であることを表す information on the internet にします。
2)some security app は可算名詞なので、a security app か、一般的に言うなら security software にします。
改善例:If you want to trust information on the internet, you have to install a security app.
採点
◆全体:7点/16点中
語い:2/4
文法:1/4
内容:3/4
構成:1/4

テンプレの理解と、細かな文法への配慮で点数が上がると思います。
※おそらくYouTubeなどに出回っている長いテンプレを持ってきたと思いますが、①の理由から非推奨です。

まず書き方(テンプレ)は
①初めの文の意見を表明する前の前置きは1文にしておく。このテンプレで高得点は見たことがないです。(120語程度の文章で長く書きすぎると理由1と2が薄くなるため)
②FirstlyにしたらSecondlyと形式を合わせる
などテンプレを覚えると良いです。

https://eigo-duke.com/write/eikenjun1t.html

文法は出来ている文と出来ていない文の差が大きいです。基本に丁寧に丁寧に書くことが大事です。添削に細かく書きましたのでぜひ見て下さい。
TOPIC
Should video games be considered a sport?

health
cost
communication
place
回答
The sport is the thing which is enjoyable, improves health and people’s communication.
On the contrary, people play video games without working out, and the conditions to play are limited.
Therefore, I think video games cannot be considered a sport.

Firstly, video games only need player’s fingers movement.
For example, they control keyboard and mouse with only their fingers to play games such as Fortnite and Apex .
It implies that video games are not sport, because they do not move their physical.

In addition, gamers cannot play video games without the internet.
When electronic issues occurs, the internet is not available, which allows gamer to not play the games.
However, people can play sports anytime and anywhere.

For the reason explained above, video games must not be considered a sport, because players do not move their body and cannot play at where they want to.
添削
The sport is the thing which is enjoyable, improves health and people’s communication.
1)「The sport」は特定の1つのスポーツを指す形になってしまうので、ここでは一般的な話として Sports are にしたほうがよいです。
2)「the thing which is enjoyable, improves health and people’s communication」は形がバラバラなので、are enjoyable and improve people’s health and communication skills のように、動詞の形と語の並びをそろえると読みやすくなります。
改善例:Sports are enjoyable and improve people’s health and communication skills.

On the contrary, people play video games without working out, and the conditions to play are limited.
→この文は不要です。理由は最初に書いた①のためです。

Therefore, I think video games cannot be considered a sport.
1)thinkよりbelieveを使うことがオススメです。エッセイではbelieveを使うことが良く、準1級からは公式解答もbelieveになるため。
改善例:Therefore, I believe video games cannot be considered a sport.

Firstly, video games only need player’s fingers movement.
1)「player’s fingers movement」は複数形の所有格は s の後に置きます。players’ finger movements か the movement of players’ fingers のように直します。
改善例:Firstly, video games only need players’ finger movements.

For example, they control keyboard and mouse with only their fingers to play games such as Fortnite and Apex .
1)「keyboard and mouse」の前に冠詞が必要なので、the keyboard and the mouse もしくは a keyboard and a mouse にします。
2)「Apex .」のように単語とピリオドの間にスペースが入っているので、Apex. とスペースをなくします。
3)全体としては、they control the keyboard and the mouse only with their fingers のように語順を少し整えると読みやすいです。
改善例:For example, they control the keyboard and the mouse only with their fingers to play games such as Fortnite and Apex.

It implies that video games are not sport, because they do not move their physical.
1)「are not sport」は、ここでも一般的な「スポーツ全体」との比較なので、are not sports か、もっと簡単に are not real sports にすると良いです。
2)「they do not move their physical」は physical (肉体の)と形容詞で終われないです。ここの they は video games を指している様に取れます。「人々は身体を動かさない」と言いたいので、people do not move their bodies または they do not get much physical exercise のように書くと良いです。
改善例:It implies that video games are not real sports, because players do not move their bodies very much.

In addition, gamers cannot play video games without the internet.
→OKです。

When electronic issues occurs, the internet is not available, which allows gamer to not play the games.
1)「issues occurs」は単数・複数が合っていません。issues occur(複数)か an electronic issue occurs(単数)にそろえる必要があります。
2)「which allows gamer to not play the games」は意味と文法が崩れています。「プレーできなくなる」と言いたいので、which makes it impossible for gamers to play または so gamers cannot play the games のようにシンプルに書き換えます。「gamer」は一般名詞なので gamers と複数にするのが良いです。
改善例:When electronic issues occur, the internet is not available, so gamers cannot play the games.

However, people can play sports anytime and anywhere.
→OKです。

For the reason explained above, video games must not be considered a sport, because players do not move their body and cannot play at where they want to.
1)「For the reason explained above」は、複数の理由をまとめているので、For the reasons explained above と複数形にする必要があります。
2)「must not be considered a sport」は、やはり全体を指すなら sports にするか、should not be considered sports と少しソフトな助動詞にするとエッセイらしくなります。
3)「do not move their body」は do not move their bodies と複数形にします。
4)「cannot play at where they want to」は「彼らがやりたい場所でプレイすることができない」で意味は伝わるのですが、cannot play wherever they want などに直すと、英語としてより良いです。
改善例:For the reasons explained above, video games should not be considered sports, because players do not move their bodies much and cannot play wherever they want.
採点
◆全体:4点/16点中
語い:1/4
文法:1/4
内容:1/4
構成:1/4

まずは基本が大事です。
・文の最初は大文字から始める。
・カンマの後は小文字
・文中に動詞がない
などのミスがたくさんあります。。。

とにかく添削に細かく書きましたが、以下ページは絶対にやってください。
まずはテンプレを覚える→よくあるミスを学ぶ→基礎文法が抜けていれば文法学習(大岩のいちばんはじめの英文法など)
https://eigo-duke.com/tango/writejun1index.html
TOPIC
Is marriage now less important today that it was in the past?

point:Diversity,Laws,Regulations,LGBT
回答
In fact, These days marriage form became various than before but, I believe marriage is important now, too.
The reasons related to child and economics.
first, children number is rapidly decreasing especially my country.
So we need to improve for next generations.

second, Now increase people who is poor.
however If married someone it can devide their economics problem.

In the other hand, We sometimes feel lonely, exhaust in alone.
Because it is too busy to work hard, wash dish, laundry only one person.

I wrote reasons for people should marry.
but, There is reason in people who do not get marry.
The reason is too small provided aid from government.
This is most of reason and biggest problem.
So government need to improve this environment as soon as possible.
So i believe marriage is very important and government should improve our countries environment.
添削
In fact, These days marriage form became various than before but, I believe marriage is important now, too.
1)カンマの後は小文字です。「These days」は文の途中なので小文字にします。
2)比較級がないのに than を使えないです。
3)「forms of marriage have become more diverse than before」のように「形式が多様になった」と言い切る形が良いです。
4)「but, I believe…」の「but」のあとにはカンマを入れません。「but I still believe that …」のように「still」を足すと、「今でも重要だ」という意味がはっきりします。
改善例:These days, forms of marriage have become more diverse than before, but I still believe that marriage is important.

The reasons related to child and economics.
1)この文には動詞がありません。「The reasons are related to …」のように「are」を入れて文を完成させます。
2)「child」は単数なので、「children」と複数形にします。
3)「economics(経済学)」ではなく、「the economy(経済状況)」を使うと意味が合います。
改善例:The reasons are related to children and the economy.

first, children number is rapidly decreasing especially my country.
1)文頭なので「first」は「First」と大文字にします。
2)「children number」ではなく、「the number of children」と言います。
3)「especially my country」には前置詞が必要です。「especially in my country」にして、「特に私の国で」という形にします。
改善例:First, the number of children is rapidly decreasing, especially in my country.

So we need to improve for next generations.
1)「So」で文を始めることはありますが、エッセイでは「So」より「Therefore」や「For this reason」などのほうが合います。
2)「improve for next generations」だけでは「何を改善するのか」が分からないので、「improve this situation for the next generations」のように「this situation」を足してあげます。
改善例:Therefore, we need to improve this situation for the next generations.

second, Now increase people who is poor.
1)文頭なので「second」は「Second」と大文字、「Now」も文頭扱いにするなら「Now,」のようにカンマを付けます。
2)言いたい内容は「貧しい人の数が増えている」なので、「The number of people who are poor is increasing now.」のように「The number of … is increasing」という形にします。「people who is」ではなく「people who are」と複数形にします。
改善例:Second, the number of people who are poor is increasing now.

however If married someone it can devide their economics problem.
1)文頭なので「however」は「However,」と大文字+カンマにします。
2)「If married someone」は主語がなく、「If they marry someone」のように「they」を入れます。
3)「devide」はスペルミスで、「divide」です。また「economics problem」ではなく、「economic problems」と複数形にするほうが良いです。「share and reduce their economic problems」のように「分け合って減らす」とすると意味がはっきりします。
改善例:However, if they marry someone, they can share and reduce their economic problems.

In the other hand, We sometimes feel lonely, exhaust in alone.
1)表現は「In the other hand」ではなく「On the other hand」です。
2)文の途中の「We」は小文字の「we」にします。
3)「exhaust in alone」は文法的におかしいので、「feel lonely and exhausted when we are alone」として、「alone」の前に「when we are」を入れると良いです。
改善例:On the other hand, we sometimes feel lonely and exhausted when we are alone.

Because it is too busy to work hard, wash dish, laundry only one person.
1)「Because」で始めると、その後にメインの文が必要です。この文単体では不完全なので、「It is too hard for one person to …」のように書き換えてしまうのが安全です。
2)「wash dish, laundry」は形がそろっていません。「wash the dishes and do the laundry」のように動詞+名詞の形を合わせます。「too busy」もここでは「too hard」のほうが意味に合います。
改善例:It is too hard for one person to work, wash the dishes, and do the laundry.

I wrote reasons for people should marry.
1)「reasons for people should marry」は形が混ざっています。「reasons why people should get married」または「reasons for getting married」のどちらかにそろえます。
2)「I wrote reasons」よりも「I have given reasons」の方が、ここまで説明してきたことをまとめるニュアンスになります。
改善例:I have given reasons why people should get married.

but, There is reason in people who do not get marry.
1)文頭に来るので「but」ではなく「But」と大文字にし、カンマは不要です。「But there is also a reason …」のように「also」を足すと「〜の一方で」という対比が出ます。
2)「do not get marry」は誤りで、「do not get married」です。「There is reason in people who…」も不自然なので、「there are also reasons why some people do not get married」と言い換えます。
改善例:But there are also reasons why some people do not get married.

The reason is too small provided aid from government.
1)この文は語順が崩れています。「provided aid from government」を先に出して、「the aid provided by the government」と名詞句にします。
2)「too small」はどこにかかるかをはっきりさせる必要があります。「One reason is that the aid provided by the government is too small.」のように、「is too small」を「aid」にかけます。「government」には「the」を付けます。
改善例:One reason is that the aid provided by the government is too small.

This is most of reason and biggest problem.
1)「most of reason」は文法的に正しくないので、「the main reason」に変えます。
2)「biggest problem」には「the」が必要です。「This is the main reason and the biggest problem.」とまとめるとすっきりします。
改善例:This is the main reason and the biggest problem.

So government need to improve this environment as soon as possible.
1)「government」は単数扱いなので、「need」ではなく「needs」です。さらに「the government」と冠詞を付けます。
2)ここで言いたいのは「環境」というより「状況」です。「this situation」に変えると意味が合います。
改善例:So the government needs to improve this situation as soon as possible.

So i believe marriage is very important and government should improve our countries environment.
1)「i」は必ず大文字の「I」にします。また「So」で始めるより「Therefore」や「In conclusion」の方が結論に合っています。
2)「government」には「the」、「countries」は「country’s」と所有格にする必要があります。「our country’s environment」または「conditions in our country」にするとよいです。
改善例:Therefore, I believe that marriage is very important, and the government should improve the conditions in our country.
採点
◆全体:5点/16点中
語い:1
文法:1
内容:1
構成:2

ほぼ間違いなく基礎文法が苦手だと思います。
心当たりあるなら大岩のいちばん初めの英文法など一冊やったほうが良いと思います。
・未来形と過去形を混在:“will gave” は時制誤りです(“will give”)
・不定詞作れていない:to watching
・仮定法、動詞ない:If they watching ← watch
・If they watching so much time to watch ← watchの連続?
・And at the end of?
・a glasses 複数形に a を付けている
などなどです。

細かくは添削に書きます。
問題文
Do you agree that people should spend less time on the Internet?
Use TWO of the points below to support your answer.

POINTS: Health / Communication / Safety / Time
回答
I agree with this opinion.
I will gave two reasons to support this opinion.

First, some people can not stop using internet.
It is because internet is very fun for them.
People gave their all time to watching internet.

Second, phon’s radio waves is not good for human eyes.
If they watching so much time to watch internet, their eyes will get tired.
And at the end of, they have to wear a glasses.

Overall, I agree that people should use less time using the internet.
添削
1)I agree with this opinion.
⇒OKです。

2)I will gave two reasons to support this opinion.
指摘:“will gave” は時制誤りです(“will give” か現在形)。

3)First, some people can not stop using internet.
指摘:“can not” は “cannot”が一般的です。
※internetは the を前に置く方が一般的です。
改善例:First, some people cannot stop using the internet.

4)It is because internet is very fun for them.
⇒OKです。

5)People gave their all time to watching internet.
指摘:“gave” は時制誤り(現在形)。“their all time” は語順誤り(all their time)。“watching the internet” は伝わりづらく “spend … online”が良いです。
改善例:People spend all their time online.

6)Second, phon’s radio waves is not good for human eyes.
指摘:綴り(phone’s)。“radio waves” と目の因果は分かりづらいです。blue light と言いたい??安全に長時間の画面凝視による目の疲れに言い換えると良いです。数も一致していないです。
改善例:Second, staring at screens for too long can strain the eyes.

7)If they watching so much time to watch internet, their eyes will get tired.
指摘:文法誤りが多いです(If + 主語 + 動詞)。前置詞・語法も修正必要です。
改善例:If they spend too much time online, their eyes get tired.

8)And at the end of, they have to wear a glasses.
指摘:“at the end of” は不要です。“a glasses” は不可算で “glasses”。
改善例:Over time, they might even need glasses.

9)Overall, I agree that people should use less time using the internet.
指摘:“use less time using” は重複表現です。“spend less time on the internet” が自然です。
改善例:Overall, I agree that people should spend less time on the internet.
採点
◆全体:5点/16点中
語い:1
文法:1
内容:1
構成:2

・多数のスペルミス
・カンマの後が大文字になっている(基本的なミス)
・単数主語なのに 動詞に s が付いていない(基本的なミス)
などなどキホンが抜けている部分を補うことと、
おそらく難しい単語(覚えたての単語)を使いすぎだと思います。自分が使える単語の量を練習で増やしていくと同時にライティング練習で間違えたスペルはしっかり覚えていくことオススメです。
※ライティングのキホンは以下やってください。 https://eigo-duke.com/tango/writejun1index.html
問題文
Many people around the world do not have enough food to eat.
Some people say that governments should work together to boost global food production.
Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Use TWO of the points below to support your answer.

POINTS: Technology / Population / Economy / Environment
回答
Government should work together to boost global food production.
The reasons for this are related to technology and population.

First, there are many people live in country where inffla is not develope.
Now, they may not require enough food even though they try to earn food by farming and domestication and so on.
If quantity of food increased, they would not have to worry about starbling.

Second,our population have boosted every year.
As a result, we need to secure more food.

Working together of government leads to improved food supply.
In conclusion,We have to copolate to enhance the food supply because it has many benefits such as saving people who live in development country and securing enough food supply.
添削
1)Government should work together to boost global food production.
1)主語は複数形にすべきです。(各国政府なので)。
2)自身の意見として最初は明確に I believe ~ を付けるべきです
改善例:I believe governments should work together to boost global food production.

The reasons for this are related to technology and population.
⇒OKです。

First, there are many people live in country where inffla is not develope.
1)“there are many people live” は関係代名詞が必要です。 pepople who live など
2)“country” は数えられるので複数にすべきです
3)“inffla” は綴り誤り(ここは “infrastructure” などでしょうか)
4)“develope” はスペルミスです。developが正しいです。
改善例:First, many people live in countries where infrastructure is not developed.

Now, they may not require enough food even though they try to earn food by farming and domestication and so on.
1)“require” は「必要とする」で意味が合わず“have/get” が適切です。
2)“earn food”なども伝わりづらいです。。。以下例を書きます。
改善例:They may not have enough food even though they grow crops and raise animals.

If quantity of food increased, they would not have to worry about starbling.
1)“quantity of food” の前に冠詞必要です。またこの場合は food supply などが良いと思います。
2)“starbling” はおそらく “starvation”。
改善例:If the food supply increased, they would not have to worry about starvation.

Second,our population have boosted every year.
1)カンマ後に1つスペース空けましょう。
2)“population” は単数主語なので has にすべき。
3)“have boosted” とは言わず、“has been increasing” などが良いです。
改善例:Second, the global population has been increasing every year.

As a result, we need to secure more food.
⇒OKです。

Working together of government leads to improved food supply.
1)“Working together of government” は with にすべきで、表現も伝わりづらく、たとえば“Cooperation among governments” が良いです。
改善例:Cooperation among governments can improve the food supply.

In conclusion,We have to copolate to enhance the food supply because it has many benefits such as saving people who live in development country and securing enough food supply.
1)カンマの後は小文字です。
2)“copolate” は “cooperate”
3)“development country” は “developing countries”
改善例:In conclusion, we must cooperate to enhance the food supply, saving people in developing countries and securing enough food.
採点
◆全体:5点/16点中
語い:1
文法:1
内容:1
構成:2

ほぼ間違いなく基礎文法が苦手だと思います。
心当たりあるなら大岩のいちばん初めの英文法など一冊やったほうが良いと思います。
・未来形と過去形を混在:“will gave” は時制誤りです(“will give”)
・不定詞作れていない:to watching
・仮定法、動詞ない:If they watching ← watch
・If they watching so much time to watch ← watchの連続?
・And at the end of?
・a glasses 複数形に a を付けている
などなどです。

細かくは添削に書きます。
問題文
Do you agree that people should spend less time on the Internet?
Use TWO of the points below to support your answer.

POINTS: Health / Communication / Safety / Time
回答
I agree with this opinion.
I will gave two reasons to support this opinion.

First, some people can not stop using internet.
It is because internet is very fun for them.
People gave their all time to watching internet.

Second, phon’s radio waves is not good for human eyes.
If they watching so much time to watch internet, their eyes will get tired.
And at the end of, they have to wear a glasses.

Overall, I agree that people should use less time using the internet.
添削
1)I agree with this opinion.
⇒OKです。

2)I will gave two reasons to support this opinion.
指摘:“will gave” は時制誤りです(“will give” か現在形)。

3)First, some people can not stop using internet.
指摘:“can not” は “cannot”が一般的です。
※internetは the を前に置く方が一般的です。
改善例:First, some people cannot stop using the internet.

4)It is because internet is very fun for them.
⇒OKです。

5)People gave their all time to watching internet.
指摘:“gave” は時制誤り(現在形)。“their all time” は語順誤り(all their time)。“watching the internet” は伝わりづらく “spend … online”が良いです。
改善例:People spend all their time online.

6)Second, phon’s radio waves is not good for human eyes.
指摘:綴り(phone’s)。“radio waves” と目の因果は分かりづらいです。blue light と言いたい??安全に長時間の画面凝視による目の疲れに言い換えると良いです。数も一致していないです。
改善例:Second, staring at screens for too long can strain the eyes.

7)If they watching so much time to watch internet, their eyes will get tired.
指摘:文法誤りが多いです(If + 主語 + 動詞)。前置詞・語法も修正必要です。
改善例:If they spend too much time online, their eyes get tired.

8)And at the end of, they have to wear a glasses.
指摘:“at the end of” は不要です。“a glasses” は不可算で “glasses”。
改善例:Over time, they might even need glasses.

9)Overall, I agree that people should use less time using the internet.
指摘:“use less time using” は重複表現です。“spend less time on the internet” が自然です。
改善例:Overall, I agree that people should spend less time on the internet.
要約の低得点事例!
採点
◆全体:6/16点
語い:2/4
文法:1/4
内容:1/4
構成:2/4

語数はOKで、抜き出すポイントも大きくは外していないですが、文法ミスがかなり多く、伝わりづらい部分が複数あります。
添削に細かく書いていますが、
・informationは数えられない名詞
・and の並列は品詞を合わせたほうが良い
・prevents(動詞) に 主語がない
など、まずは基礎文法をしっかり押さえて書くことが点数を安定させると思います。
問題文
Clothing rental subscription is a service that allows you to rent various items for a monthly fee. There are different rental methods depending on the number of items delivered, and there are plans where you can choose your favorite items, and plans where you receive coordinated outfits selected by a stylist. In the United States, as of 2020, over 11 million users have used this service. And the US clothing rental market could reach $4.4 billion by 2028.

With a subscription service, you can rent unique designer items for a low price. This cuts down on the number of items you buy and wear only once and throw away. The amount of clothing waste in Japan alone exceeds 500,000 tons annually, so such a service would be beneficial to the environment.

On the other hand, the disadvantage of a clothing rental subscription is that you cannot try the items on in advance. Nor can you pick up the actual item and touch it. You can only check the images and information posted, and there may be some discrepancies. Moreover, most of the products handled by the clothing subscription service are not new.
回答
More and more American are using clothing subscription services, which provides them with various products for a monthly fee by choosing methods along with customer’s hopes. This advantage is that they can wear unique items with low cost and reducing the amount of clothing trash prevents environmental problems. However, the negative effects are that you must judge few informations without investigating them in detail. Also,most of them are older.
添削
More and more American are using clothing subscription services, which provides them with various products for a monthly fee by choosing methods along with customer’s hopes.
1)more and more なので、American → Americans(複数形) にすべきです。
2), which ではありますが、servicesと複数形が先行詞だと思います。そのため provides → provide が良いと思います。
改善例:More and more Americans are using clothing subscription services, which provide them with various products for a monthly fee by choosing methods along with customer’s hopes.

This advantage is that they can wear unique items with low cost and reducing the amount of clothing trash prevents environmental problems.
1)with ではなく at low cost が良いです。
2)and の並列は品詞を合わせたほうが良いです。 wear and reduce が良いです。
3)prevents に 主語がないです。 , which prevents など関係代名詞節(ここは前節全体を指す非制限用法)を作ってあげる必要があります。
改善例:An advantage is that users can wear unique designer items at low cost and reduce the amount of clothing trash ,which prevents environmental problems.

However, the negative effects are that you must judge few informations without investigating them in detail.」
1)informationは数えられない名詞です。 less information などにすべきです。
2)must judge だと (情報を)判断すべき となるので意味が伝わらないので、 rely on / decide from などで表現すべきです。
改善例:However, a drawback is that you must decide based only on limited online information.

Also,most of them are older.
1)them が何を指すか分かりづらいです。 itemsなどにする必要があります。
2)また新品ではないと言いたいと思います。以下の様に書けます。
採点
◆全体:7/16点
語い:2/4
文法:1/4
内容:2/4
構成:2/4

要約は「元の文をみじかくまとめること」です。元の文から単語や表現を言い換える必要はありますが、内容を変えるとNGです。この要約の最初の文など内容が変わってしまっている部分があります。

また、文法ミスが多いです。
・decreasing tuition fees allow → allows (三人称単数のsが抜けている)
・encourage → encourages (三人称単数のsが抜けている)
・there are possibility → there is a possibility of (名詞が単数なのに there are になっている)
など気を付けながら丁寧に丁寧に書きたいです。

細かくは添削に書いています。
問題文
Students in many countries give up on attending university because they cannot afford the tuition fees. In Germany, by contrast, education has traditionally been considered a public good, and tuition fees have typically been quite low. In fact, as a result of the German attitude toward education, they were almost completely eliminated at public universities in the country. Many people hope that this policy will continue.

Supporters of the policy argue that education is a basic right. They say that it should not be dependent on an individual's financial background. By making tuition mostly free, the barrier for students from low-income families has been lowered. Furthermore, there are financial benefits to such a policy. A highly educated workforce creates more innovation and economic growth. This policy also attracts international students. Many of these students end up staying in the country after graduation. They then contribute to the economy.

However, critics argue that eliminating tuition fees is a costly policy. It creates a significant financial burden for the country. This financial burden is said to be unfair to people who pay taxes. Many of them did not attend university. Nevertheless, they are being forced to pay for other people to attend.
回答
In Germany, tuition fees were decreased in some universities so there are many students who give up on going university because of money. Suppoters advocate that decreasing tuition fees allow poor students to remove hardle of attending university. Moreover, spreading high quality education encourage the country to bring innovation and economic growth. But, critics claim that there are possibility to rise burden such as taxes.
添削
In Germany, tuition fees were decreased in some universities so there are many students who give up on going university because of money.
1)元の文の意味を取り違えています。元の文は「ドイツでは“ほぼ廃止”」「一方“多くの国では断念(出来ていない)”」が正しいです。
2)文法(going university→going to university)、因果の誤用(so)。
改善例:In Germany, tuition fees were decreased at universities, but many students in other countries give up on going to university because of money.

Suppoters advocate that decreasing tuition fees allow poor students to remove hardle of attending university.
1)スペルミス:Suppoters→Supporters, hardle→hurdle
2)主語‐動詞一致(allow→allows)
3)remove hurdleは日本語だとハードルを取り除くですが、英語だと lowers the barrier などです。
4)対象の明確化して書けるとより良いです。low-income familiesなど。
改善例:Supporters advocate that decreasing tuition fees allows poor students to remove the hurdle to attending university.

Moreover, spreading high quality education encourage the country to bring innovation and economic growth.
1)主語‐動詞一致(encourage→encourages)
2)high-qualityはハイフンでつなげてあげるのが一般的です。
3)bringは伝わりづらいので、主語を「高度に教育された労働力(a highly educated workforce」にすると意味が通ると思います。
改善例:Moreover, a highly educated workforce drives innovation and economic growth.

But, critics claim that there are possibility to rise burden such as taxes.
1)there are possibility→there is a possibility of
2)rise burden → a costly burden
3)But は However, や On the other hand, が良いです。
改善例:However, critics claim that there is a possibility of increased burdens such as taxes.
採点
◆全体:5点(16点中)
・語い:1点
・文法:1点
・内容:1点
・構成:2点

かなり崩れています。

①まずは要約の基礎を押さえるべきです。
・要約は『改行しない』が正しいです。※意見を書く英作文は改行してOK
・要約は「元の文を短くまとめる事」です。かなりの部分で元の文の意味を逃しています。押さえるのはポイントだけでOKなのですが、独自にかなり作ってしまっている。
出来る限り改善例に書きました。見てみてください。

②そして英作文のキホンをしっかり押さえるべきです。(いくつかはLINEへのコピペミスかも)
・文の最後はしっかりピリオドを置く
・So It と文中でいきなり大文字
・carは数えられるので“using cars”
・many(たくさんの)なら complains とすべき。そしてmany なのだから 動詞は isでなくare にすべき。
・It did not の後に動詞を置いていない

まだ参加していないなら 英語漬けの準1級オプチャはぜひ参加ください。
問題文
In 2013, public transportation became free in Tallinn, the capital of Estonia. Before that, free public transportation initiatives had been implemented only in relatively small municipalities and never in a capital city. Under the initiative, only registered residents can purchase a "green card" for two euros, and with that, all buses, streetcars, and trolleybuses in the city are free of charge.

These initiatives were expected to bring benefits, such as increased tax revenues due to a population increase for free rides, reduced equipment costs for railway companies, contributing to a better environment due to reduced number of cars, and improved mobility for low-income people.

According to a 2014 survey, it is true that the number of times Tallinn residents walked on foot decreased by 40%. However, the number of times they traveled by car decreased by only 5%. Apparently, the effect on gas emissions was not as large as had been expected. And of course, this does not seem to be suitable for every city. For example, in Paris, France, there are many people who oppose the idea of free fares, believing that it would simply lead to a reduction in fare revenues, which would ultimately increase the burden on taxpayers.
回答
Beginning of Public transportation could be used people have green card.”
Supporters think the initiative allowed Tallinn to increase tax revenue, improve environment and provide transportation for poor people.
Citizens became not to stroll by 40%
However , critics point out that using car decreased only 5%. So It did not effective.”
Moreover many complain is occurred because its fee was paid taxpayers
添削
Beginning of Public transportation could be used people have green card.”
1)いつ・どこ・だれが対象(登録住民・2ユーロのグリーンカード)を明確に示すべきです。すべて書くのは無理でも重要なポイントはしっかり書く。
2)“Beginning of” は不要です。
改善例:In 2013, Tallinn made transit free for registered residents with a €2 green card.

Supporters think the initiative allowed Tallinn to increase tax revenue, improve environment and provide transportation for poor people.
⇒OKです。

Citizens became not to stroll by 40%
1)文の最後にピリオドがないです。
2)“became not to stroll” は伝わりづらく“walked less—down 40%” など書くと良いです。
3)もう少し元の文も内容を入れて表現したいです。
改善例:A 2014 survey found walking fell by 40% among residents.

However , critics point out that using car decreased only 5%. So It did not effective.”
1)カンマの前はスペースを空けない。カンマの後は1つスペースを空けましょう。
2)So It と文中でいきなり大文字になっています。
3)carは数えられるので“using cars”にすべきです。
4)It did not の後に動詞を置いていないです。
“It did not effective” → “it wasn’t very effective”など。
改善例:However, car trips fell by only 5%, so the emissions impact was smaller than expected.

Moreover many complain is occurred because its fee was paid taxpayers
1)many(たくさんの)なら complains とすべき。
2)many なのだから 動詞は are にすべき。
3)論点は運賃収入減 → 納税者負担増の流れです。そこを書きたいです。
※fee was paid 'by' taxpayers と by が抜けています。
改善例:Moreover, opponents argue free fares cut revenue and shift costs to taxpayers.
下のボタンから英語漬けサイトでライティング練習(AI添削付き)
英検準1級のライティング練習

≪ 英検準1級メニューへ戻る